Mr Clegg could name his price - almost certainly the scrapping of the first-past-the-post voting system which has given Britain such stability-over the centuries, in favour of the mayhem of proportional representation - and Labour would quickly agree, such is their desperation to remain in office. But Labour could have the largest number of seats and - by convention - would be entitled to ask Mr Clegg to form a coalition government.
![military wake up time military wake up time](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gwAuZUswAic/maxresdefault.jpg)
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Tough talk on borders won't cut it any more 24/07/22.But, as we shall explain later, it's their commitment to proportional representation, with the paralysis and chicanery that involves, that could have a devastating effect on Britain.Įlectors need to understand that, by voting for Mr Clegg, and thereby handing him the sufficient number of seats required to hold the balance of power in a hung Parliament, this is precisely what could happen. Mr Clegg has a number of policies on which we can agree, and by strongly putting the case for making efficiencies in the excessively bureaucratic NHS, he has stolen a march upon his rivals.īut there is much in the LibDem manifesto - some of it carefully camouflaged - that does not survive thorough scrutiny.Īs we have argued in recent days, we passionately disagree with Mr Clegg's position on tax, Europe (which, suicidally, extends to Britain joining the single currency), the granting of an amnesty for a million illegal immigrants, the scrapping of Britain's nuclear deterrent and their effete and wooly proposals for law and order.
![military wake up time military wake up time](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/3d/04/fe/3d04fec311095d9027aed669b8382abb--frock-coat-sash-belts.jpg)
![military wake up time military wake up time](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/y8R-ohNlp9E/maxresdefault.jpg)
The party has an admirable record in defending civil liberties, exposing the Government's complicity in torture and opposing the Iraq war. That is why, with polling day barely two weeks away, the Mail urges its readers to wake up and get real: Yes, the political classes deserve our contempt, but do we really want a hung Parliament with the paralysis, indecision and political chicanery that this will involve?įirst, let's be clear that this newspaper has nothing against the Lib-Dems.
![military wake up time military wake up time](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pelDdFgajFk/maxresdefault.jpg)
Indeed, the idea is taking such strong root that the BBC, with risible lack of objectivity, has begun to refer blithely to such a scenario as a 'balanced Parliament' - a description that could not possibly be further from the truth. A growing number of people seem to want a hung Parliament in which no single party can govern by itself.